VBOX GPS data logging systems are ideal for the development, testing and validation of Autonomous Emergency Braking (AEB) and Forward Collision Warning (FCW).
AEB and FCW are necessary features if a new passenger vehicle is to achieve a five-star Euro NCAP rating. By 2018 AEB and Lane Departure Warning systems will be mandatory for all new commercial vehicles throughout Europe (UNECE Regulation on AEBS steps 1 and 2).
VBOX equipment provides positional accuracy to 2cm along with a real-time output of the relevant parameters required to develop such systems. When used in conjunction with Euro NCAP-approved steering and pedal robots, the VBOX 3i Dual Antenna with RTK (VB3iSLR) outputs data that meets the requirements set out in the NCAP assessment.
For a list of all standard GPS data channels and accuracies that are also measured please refer to the VBOX 3i RTK product page.
Meeting the Euro NCAP standards successfully requires the use of steering and pedal robots to maintain accurate conditions for speed, drive line, distance and braking as laid out in the test requirements.
VBOX equipment can be used with officially approved robots manufactured by providers such as Anthony Best Dynamics and VEHICO to achieve the necessary level of consistency, essential when conducting such tests.
Below are two examples of FCW test being carried out, where the aim is to achieve a separation between the two vehicles of 30m whilst they are both travelling at 72.5km/h. The speed of the two vehicles is represented by the red and blue traces, whilst the separation is shown in green.
The first graph shows a test performed by two experienced human drivers:
The second shows a similar test, but with the speed and separation being controlled by the VBOX and brake/acceleration robot.
As you can see, the automated system achieves the correct speeds and separation in substantially less distance (485m) compared with the human controlled test (1680m). By using a robot to perform such tests, it also ensures that once the desired speed and separation have been reached the pressure applied to the brake pedal of the target vehicle does not exceed 0.3g of force. This reduces the likelihood of an error occurring and saves the manufacturer time in having to repeat the test.
Single Robot in Vehicle Under Test (VUT)
Although using a single robot in the VUT stills leaves the test open to human error, it greatly simplifies the process with the engineer in the towing vehicle simply having to drive in a straight line and not amend any path variations. Recent advances in path-following technology have also proven that by using the "look-ahead path following" capabilities of the combined systems means that if the human-driven towing target car deviates from a straight path, the VUT can track it accurately and maintain the minimum lateral deviation necessitated by the test. This therefore reduces set-up time, equipment complexity and cost, by only requiring one steering robot.
Real Time Feedback for Driver Guidance
Communicating via radio the VBOX systems are able to display live readings of speed, yaw rate, longitudinal range and the all-important lateral range (the most difficult criteria to fulfil to NCAP standards) - with user configurable thresholds - so that the vehicle-under-test driver has the ability to maintain a consistent path. This immediate display of results also effectively allows engineers to gain instant pass/fail feedback, greatly speeding up the development process and reducing costs.
Relocate the VBOX to the EVT
Under EURO NCAP test recommendations the measurement system (VBOX) should be placed in the towing car, but due to the position of the EVT - at th end of a 26m towing rig - its lateral position can differ substanstially. This could be caused by simple factors like worn rollers, road camber or side winds, that can result in the +/- 10cm lateral range tolerance outlined by NCAP being exceeded and thus invalidating the results. The solution is to mount the VBOX inside a secure Peli case on the rear of the EVT itself. This ensures that the measurements taken by the VBOX accurately reflect the true position projected by the tow vehicle ahead.
When used in conjunction with Video VBOX or VBOX HD, the measured parameters can be graphically overlaid in real time onto the recorded video, providing a clear visual reference to the performance of the test.
Graphical overlay is totally user configurable and can be easily altered to present relevant information according to the tests being conducted.
It is now possible to ‘map’ the shape of vehicles using a survey pole, antenna, and VBOX Manager. Up to twenty-four points around the vehicle bodies can be surveyed, and the ‘shape’ of each car can be stored for later use. As the test is conducted, the distance of the closest contact points between the vehicles is calculated to +/-2cm accuracy, automatically switching to the nearest contact points as they change with the car’s relative positions.
This allows for multiple procedures to be completed without having to reconfigure for individual contact points – such as moving from right rear to left rear flank during blind spot testing. This video demonstrates how the system works:
Open Road AEB Testing
By substituting the DGPS Base Station with a specially configured VBOX 3i Dual Antenna with RTK, our MOVING BASE test setup allows users to test and verify active safety systems outside the test track. VBOX Moving Base enables you to ...
- Conduct realistic testing amongst other road users and roadside architecture
- Test over a large area
- Measure with relative positional accuracy between subject and target vehicle of under 5 cm
- Maintain RTK lock between VBOX units with up to 600m of vehicle separation in good conditions
Free Analysis Software
VBOX Tools Analysis Software is a flexible and powerful package which allows for detailed post processing of the logged files in order to test the accuracy of your ADAS system. A laptop running VBOX Tools can be used to monitor the measured parameters in real time, either by a serial, USB, or Bluetooth connection. For Video VBOX files, video can be viewed synchronized with the data within the software.
AEB / Collision warning signals
If the vehicle carries the AEB / FCWS operation data on its CAN Bus, this can be simultaneously logged (and displayed in video if a Video VBOX is also being used) alongside that of the GPS data, giving you an exact comparison between relative vehicle position and onboard strategy data.
VBOX Test Systems
Autonomous Emergency Braking and Collision Mitigation testing and system validation can be conducted on the test track using a static DGPS Base Station, or on open roads via the Moving Base solution. A typical RACELOGIC test system comprises of:
VBOX 3i RTK (x2)
Each RLVB3iSLR logs up to 64 channels simultaneously (excl. standard GPS).
Several Radio Pairs
DGNSS Base Station RTK
VBOX CAN Hub
Tripod for GPS Antenna
Video VBOX Pro (optional)
Preview Monitor (optional)
Camera Mounting Arm (optional)
VBOX systems are suitable for the following test scenarios:
- ISO15623 for Forward Vehicle Collision Warning Systems
- NHTSA NCAP Forward Collision Warning System confirmation test
- Euro NCAP Autonomous Emergency Braking
Testing to Euro NCAP
Euro NCAP classifies AEB systems into three types: City, Inter-urban and Pedestrian. The first two types will be required in Euro NCAP tests from 2014, with Pedestrian tests to follow in 2016. The official Euro NCAP procedure also describes how Forward Collision Warning system tests are to be performed.
In the AEB test procedure for City and Inter-urban systems, the vehicle under test follows a soft target towed by another vehicle, with a range of closing velocities. The procedure specifies that the two vehicles must meet a series of conditions at the point the test starts:
- Speed of vehicle under test (test speed, +1/-0 kph)
- Speed of soft target (test speed +1/-0 kph)
- Lateral deviation from straight-line path, both vehicles (0 ±0.1m)
- Relative distance between test vehicle and soft target (0 ±0.5m)
- Yaw velocity, both vehicles (0 ±1.0°/s)
- Steering wheel velocity (0 ±15.0°/s)
Once the test conditions are met, the towing vehicle brakes at a constant deceleration whilst the test vehicle's AEB system should detect this and apply the brakes. In order to perform this procedure efficiently, robots should be used.
VBOX test systems are compatible with ABD steering and pedal robots, and VEHICO systems.
Testing to NHTSA NCAP
Three test procedures are specified in the NHTSA NCAP Forward Collision Warning Confirmation Test:
1) Subject Vehicle (SV) encounters stopped Principal Other Vehicle (POV) on a straight road
2) SV encounters decelerating POV
3) SV encounters slower POV
Test 1 - Stationary POV
This test evaluates the ability of the FCW function to detect a stopped lead vehicle. In order to pass the test, the FCW alert must be issued when the time-to-collision (TTC) is at least 2.1 seconds.
The FCW system must satisfy the TTC alert criteria for at least five of the seven test trials.
Test 2 - Decelerating POV
The subject vehicle (blue) follows the target vehicle (orange) at a constant time gap. The test evaluates the ability of the FCW to recognise a decelerating lead vehicle and to issue an alert to SV driver in a timely manner.
In order to pass the test, the FCW alert must be issued when the time-to-collision (TTC) is at least 2.4 seconds.
Test 3 - Slower POV
The test evaluates the ability of the FCW to recognise a slower lead vehicle being driven at a constant speed and issue a timely alert.
In order to pass the test, the FCW alert must be issued when the time-to-collision (TTC) is at least 2 seconds.
Testing to ISO 15623
ISO 15623 defines three test procedures:
1) Detection Zone Tests
Determines if the FCW system detects a test target when it's in the system's detection range and measures the separation when it's in measurement range.
2) Warning Distance Accuracy Tests
Determines if the FCW systems issues a warning at the distance it states to do it.
The subject vehicle is driven towards the target at the maximum vehicle speed at which the FCW system is able to operate. The warning distance is measured at the minimum detectable distance (t0), and when the warning is issued (t1). The distance at which the warning signal occurred (D) is then compared to the warning distance specified by the manufacturer.
3) Target Discrimination Tests
Involves two or more obstacle vehicles and determines whether the FCW system is able to identify the (closest) vehicle in the subject vehicle's trajectory.
3a) Straight road longitudinal discrimination
The subject vehicle follows two target vehicles at the maximum speed the FCWS is capable of operating. The nearer target vehicle shall not mask the other.
The subject vehicle (blue) accelerates until it produces a preliminary warning, then decelerates until warning stops and keeps speed. Then, the nearer target vehicle decelerates until the subject vehicle (blue) produces a warning.
The test is successfully fulfilled if the subject vehicle has produced a warning.
3b) Straight road lateral discrimination
Two vehicles (orange/ green) travel alongside at the maximum speed the FCWS is capable of operating. The spacing between the longitudinal centrelines of the cars is 3.5m ± 0.25m.
The subject vehicle (blue) follows the target vehicles (orange) at the same speed. The lateral displacement between subject vehicle and the target vehicle shouldn't be more than 0.5m measured from their longitudinal centreline.
First the forward vehicle decelerates (green). Then, the target vehicle (orange) decelerates until it's in the detection range of the subject vehicle's FCWS.
The test is successful when the subject vehicle issues a warning signal for the second scenario and doesn't react to the first.
3c) Curved road lateral discrimination
The same test is conducted on a circle or a sufficient part of a circle with a curve radios specified by the ISO systems classifications.
The test is successful when the subject vehicle doesn't issue a warning when the forward vehicle (green) decelerates, and issues a preliminary collision warning when the target vehicle decelerates.
3d) Overhead discrimination
A test target which may cause false warnings is installed at a height defined according to the road standard of each country. The subject vehicle approaches the test target.
The test is successful if the subject vehicle has not produced a warning.